Clinical Environmental Epidemiology in the News
Journal of subClinical Investigations™ interview with Electronics and Communication Engineer RCA NYC – Sarnoff Institute Princeton NJ Clinical Medical Risk Expert prof dr. J Dumanov esq with Claire Marie Du Champ April 18, 2020
CMD: Professor Dumanov, it is a honor and pleasure to meet you. Thank you for this interview about Down Syndrome, Autism and EMF in what you refer to more broadly EMS, the Electromagnetic Spectrum . While planning this interview I learned that you had just returned from of all places Milan, Italy at the breakout of Covid 19. What brought you there at that time?
PJD: It was coincidental. As an Clinical Epidemiologist in practice for over 20 years, I am invited to lecture and present at medical conferences and meetings that are regularly scheduled for me well in advance and for presentations, and lectures for such meetings. This was medcial conference was planned 8 months in advance. Many friends and family suggested and pleaded that I not attend because of the early reports regarding CV. For this conference Mucor Mycosis that was held in Lugano Switzerland was via Milan. Upon arriving, Milan authorities just began performing random temperature checks of people in the streets. The DaVinci museums closed the following day of arrival. The Lugano medical conference registered nearly 500 attendees; medical doctors and scientists, of which only 250 appearing, mainly being the epidemiologists as such are highly integrated. CV was discussed amongst ourselves briefly, and then we went on to business without further discussion. I learned that the delegation from China had been cancelled from attending. After the 5 days in Lugano, another meeting was held in Geneva at CERN with scientists for some of my related EMS quanta studies. After these meetings onto business in Amsterdam and Dusseldorf, and upon returning to the U.S. I was requested to be tested – negative. In the days following in discussion with associated international researchers sharing my observations, interviews and findings on CV-19 during this time initiated our team to write and release one of the earliest and most comprehensive studies and review of CV-19 for the scientific community. We will see the outcome in the coming weeks. I do expect based upon the science and historical data CV-19 will pass on in history like the many other influenza seasons. As you may know the CV is a member of the common flu is a Corona specie. Certainly expect this virus will be behind us by summer’s end.
CMD: Thank you. Interesting, we would like a follow up on the CV-19 in the months to come. For the purpose of this interview about EMF from electrical lines and their fields relating to Down Syndrome (DS), we have seen reports published regarding DS and the possible relationship to EMF field exposure. We ask you, professor Dumanov with your work in clinical epidemiology and your integrations EMF over the past two decades has given you unmatched insight regarding EMF and the effects in the real world population for the undiagnosed patients. Recently the Center for Disease Control reported there has been a 30% increase in Down syndrome since 1973 and then, a decrease in those living with DS since 2010. What is causing this change and what have you learned from your studies about DS and EMF since that time?
PJD: Yes, I am very familiar with the data. What is critically important is that all my over 1,200 in situ studies has made the clinical connections with exposure to the elements of the electromagnetic spectrum quite clear. The steady increase of DS in the population that had been recorded from 1950 until 2010 in a study of nine NE, U.S. states, including Northern NJ, Hudson Valley NY, CT and others indicates support from my own studies. After this time the population then began decrease due to DS related elective terminations that are not fully recorded. Data suggests that DS continues to rise suggesting due to an expanding technological electromagnetic human environment and that data has not yet been fully presented. Why? Lack of integrations necessary for publications. With over 40 years of study in molecular biology to this day what I continue to see is references to weak, vague and inconclusive studies. In fact I reviewed a publication on this subject by well recognized researchers that was without a definitive conclusion. I was dismayed but not shocked nor surprised. I have the science, life long experience with the electron and fully understand what needs to be understood. My and the collective research group will when published clearly outline the specific oncogenic effects of EMF on humans. Yes, now onto DS.
CMD: What and where is the evidence that EMF fields have a role in Down Syndrome?
PJD: Yes, for myself as a legal author in in the domain of civil rights the word is “evidence”. Scientists are only interested in the evidence. For publication the evidence is “proofed” by replication and then way of the peer review process that may involve a dozen or even more published related expert scientists reviewing such publications. Having had highly integrated careers, academics, and experience including in short, electronics, law and integrated clinical medical molecular biology this approach has become the standard for interest in this practice. During my focal genomic studies and at my request with Ansuman Chattopadhyay of chromosome 21 at University of Pittsburgh Medical MBIS, identification of select chromosomal regions and sequences that I originally identified as fragile to EMF exposure were defined and confirmed based upon my previous studies being so vulnerable to select EMF resonant fields. Upon concluding research and our findings in patients and client habitations the evidence is to my fullest satisfaction that elements of the electromagnetic spectrum do play a critical role in initiating and promoting DS.
CMD: But professor, do we not have EMF around us everywhere and everyday from 5G, radio, TV, cell phone, WIFI, home and office electricity? I even read that the Earth’s magnetic field is also present. What are we to do? Do these not all have an effect?
PJD: Everything you are saying is true. Yes, there are natural Earth Magnetic Fields and artificial Electric Magnetic Fields. In fact life on Earth may never have existed or certainly be in a different form without magnetic fields. It must also be understood these fields may also have beneficial effects in health and medicine. My extensive work in oncology recognizes EMF as highly effective in treatment in combination for many of the cancers. Many fail to note that these are emissions and fields not recognized by any commonly detected that I routinely test for the clinical diagnosis..
CMD: This gets confusing. So you are saying EMF can help and harm? When does it do one or the other?
PJD: Yes, that is where the problem lies. Knowing when, where and how this works. This was the basis of my calling, a cancer in a young female sibling. Although there are thousands of studies of which I have reviewed, including the most advanced scientific publications that are not publicly available that support the clinical hypothesis for this practice that fully validates my research, studies and reports.
CMD: Yes, but you have not answered the question. How does one know when they are at risk?
PJD: Your question is simple but the answer unfortunately begs to answer the question for the exposure within the human habitation being home, office, workplace and other situations. And then the individuals present in such locations and the nature of the EMF fields present. I have see many cases when attempts to identify EMF causation for the diagnosis were not recognized and the exposed patient continued to suffer and progress in their disease to termination. Fortunately for all of my case studies the applied integrations necessary for the clinical diagnostics routinely identify and reveal such factors and agents for improving the health and in some cases clearly saving the lives of the patients.
CMD: For the woman looking forward to having children and avoiding the possibility of Down Syndrome that should she do?
PJD:You must also know DS is not just from the maternal side, but also from male paternal side. Having performed decades of health risk investigations have identified that females, infants and children have highest risk. But in general the female is a greater risks far more so than that for males for many reasons. My independent findings for DS were subsequently fully supported in the scientific research of the published studies. In conclusion the effects of EMF and the resulting diagnostic outcomes are dependent on numerous factors. These include genetic predisposition, age, health status and environmental toxicity and more. In closing parent to be must assure their home is safe at all levels. Epigenetically, EMF alone is rarely a risk. For DS this is fully support by the fact long before he invention of electricity, that in 1866, Dr. John Langdon Down described the features of what is now known as “Down Syndrome”. Genetic Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD)have a similar related evolutionary history. In closing health risk studies should be performed when there is a family history on either maternal or paternal side, indicated in a genetic profile or any risk that is believe to be present in the home.
CDM: Is there also a relationship between Autism, Down Syndrome and EMF ?
PJD: I will share this that during my epidemiological studies at the CDC in Atlanta I discovered there is similar data, clearly in the time lines as DS and ASD recently as noted by the CDC research studies. There is much data that has not yet been released.
CMD: interesting, can it be concluded that by comparing the data in rise of both DS and ASD during during the times starting with wireless phones and communications devices?
PJD: The data does suggest this. But again for each and every individual case of DS and ASD the facts must be scientifically examined and validated. We will see in time for now. From your suggestions, I think you now have a lead as what may be going on given the data.
CMD: Where can I get more information about EMF exposure?
PJD: Find the highest standard for study. The only sources reliable are pure, unbiased, unconflicted scientific and academically peer reviewed publications from well recognized universities and their academicians. In general disregard any writings that are associate with the sales of EMF meters, gadgets, shields, filters, services without legal authorities i.e. licensing and other disqualifications.
CMD: So how do you suggest should the average person learn more about EMF and what should they be reading about it?
PJMD: I am sharing some information that may be a surprise. The numbers people read about EMF and their interpretation are based upon numerous misconceptions including references by all the self made academies now appearing on the web about EMF meters and fields. No one even considers the ineffectiveness and the meaningless output of the so-called meters. What is published on the web about EMF is all amateurish. Why can I say this? I have been with the electron at every level for over 40 years and in medical human molecular biology as an epidemiologist with a high level of integration in immunology, toxicology and related oncology.
CMD: So where can I read the real scientific papers on the health effects that will provide me the answers?
PJD:You will not find it in any publication at this time with all the answers. I will be publishing my work in the next year or so that will explain it all as I have seen hundreds of cases, and yes, some tragic. I have been pleased that very often with patients my findings and remedies relieved their conditions at many levels.
Until that publication be cautious,because when you examine the common papers about EMF you read you will find they are not post-doctoral peer reviewed, that they are commercial in origin and conflicted to sell things, and always lack the highly integrated technical and medical authority. I have seen the papers for over 20 years and publications years and also see research that is not made publicly available. Some of then look and sound to be credible but are flawed in too many ways to discuss.
CMD: Why do the papers I read are vague or inconclusive about risk exposure?
PJD: Actually if you review the abstracts of these publications you will see the full scope and rarely do they answer the questions you are looking for because they are published for a focused and select area of interest for researchers. As such, the real scientific research is mainly and almost only accessible to other scientists that are sometimes only available 10 years after publication. These research papers are also unintentionally in effect considered encrypted in a language, with theories and hypotheses for outcomes written for a small academic or research audience that only they themselves understand with language and in a diction that is also not in easily defined in publication. Yes, career post docs will tell you there are many levels above the glass ceiling.
CMD: Yes, but where does that leave us?
PJD: Like many that have an interest, question and examine carefully what is commonly written before making any major life decisions. For anyone that has a serious health concern or high order need, physician, patient or other contact me.
CMD: Wow. Thank you for your time professor Dumanov.
